Doorgaan naar hoofdnavigatie Doorgaan naar zoeken Ga verder naar hoofdinhoud

Overview of JET results

  • JET-EFDA Contributors
  • EFDA-JET
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology
  • Imperial College London
  • Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives
  • Queens University
  • Helsinki University of Technology
  • Culham Centre for Fusion Energy
  • Associazione EURATOM-ENEA sulla Fusione
  • Troitsk Insitute of Innovating and Thermonuclear Research (TRINITI)
  • Consorzio Rfx
  • Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión
  • Instituto Superior Técnico
  • Wigner Research Centre for Physics
  • Chalmers University of Technology
  • Uppsala Universitet
  • Kurchatov Institute
  • Association EURATOM-MEdC
  • National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
  • Università degli Studi di Catania
  • Dublin City University
  • University of Ghent
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • Fusion for Energy
  • Aalto University
  • Nuclear Fuel Plant
  • Lehigh University
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  • Karlsruher Institut für Technologie
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis
  • Lviv Polytechnic National University
  • EFDA CSU-Garching
  • STUDIECENTRUM VOOR KERNENERGIE / CENTRE D'ETUDE DE L'ENERGIE NUCLEAIRE
  • The National Institute for Optoelectronics
  • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • General Atomics
  • University of Cagliari
  • University of California
  • Colorado School of Mines
  • Japan Atomic Energy Agency
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  • FOM-Instituut voor Plasmafysica 'Rijnhuizen'
  • Russian Academy of Science
  • Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
  • Institute of Plasma Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
  • European Commission
  • NCSR 'Demokritos'
  • Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB)
  • Austrian Academy of Science
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • Seoul National University
  • ITER
  • Daegu University
  • Lithuanian Energy Institute
  • Lund University
  • International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
  • National Technical University of Athens
  • University of Stuttgart
  • University of Tartu
  • University of Latvia
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Jozef Stefan Institute
  • Moscow State University
  • Technical University of Denmark
  • Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
  • The 'Horia Hulubei' National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering
  • University of Strathclyde
  • Politecnico di Torino
  • University of Warwick
  • Tampere University
  • University of York
  • Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan een tijdschriftArtikelpeer review

48 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

Since the last IAEA Conference JET has been in operation for one year with a programmatic focus on the qualification of ITER operating scenarios, the consolidation of ITER design choices and preparation for plasma operation with the ITER-like wall presently being installed in JET. Good progress has been achieved, including stationary ELMy H-mode operation at 4.5 MA. The high confinement hybrid scenario has been extended to high triangularity, lower ρ*and to pulse lengths comparable to the resistive time. The steady-state scenario has also been extended to lower ρ*and ν*and optimized to simultaneously achieve, under stationary conditions, ITER-like values of all other relevant normalized parameters. A dedicated helium campaign has allowed key aspects of plasma control and H-mode operation for the ITER non-activated phase to be evaluated. Effective sawtooth control by fast ions has been demonstrated with3He minority ICRH, a scenario with negligible minority current drive. Edge localized mode (ELM) control studies using external n = 1 and n = 2 perturbation fields have found a resonance effect in ELM frequency for specific q95values. Complete ELM suppression has, however, not been observed, even with an edge Chirikov parameter larger than 1. Pellet ELM pacing has been demonstrated and the minimum pellet size needed to trigger an ELM has been estimated. For both natural and mitigated ELMs a broadening of the divertor ELM-wetted area with increasing ELM size has been found. In disruption studies with massive gas injection up to 50% of the thermal energy could be radiated before, and 20% during, the thermal quench. Halo currents could be reduced by 60% and, using argon/deuterium and neon/deuterium gas mixtures, runaway electron generation could be avoided. Most objectives of the ITER-like ICRH antenna have been demonstrated; matching with closely packed straps, ELM resilience, scattering matrix arc detection and operation at high power density (6.2 MW m-2) and antenna strap voltages (42 kV). Coupling measurements are in very good agreement with TOPICA modelling.

Originele taal-2Engels
Artikelnummer094008
TijdschriftNuclear Fusion
Volume51
Nummer van het tijdschrift9
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - sep 2011

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Overview of JET results'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit