TY - JOUR
T1 - Higher education and firms
T2 - On the interaction between research and regional policies
AU - Gérard, Marcel
AU - Gilson, Natacha
AU - Ruiz, Fernando
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements This article is part of project IAP 6/09 ôHigher Education and Researchö financed by the Belgian Federal Ministry for Scientific Research, Belspo. Comments and suggestions by Jay Wilson and anonymous referees of this Journal are gratefully acknowledged.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - In the European Union, a series of competencies are shared between a central agency called the European Commission, and the governments of the Member States. This paper focuses on two of those policies: research and regional development. Here, we model and discuss how the level of commitment of a central authority toward poor regions affects the design of the best decision-making process. We explore cases of full centralization and full decentralization, and situations where the two levels of government are allowed to take decisions, either simultaneously or sequentially. In the latter case, we make a distinction between a situation where the central agency decides first as in most federations, and one in which it decides second, then being an agent of national governments. This setting is especially relevant for the European Union. We show, in particular, that when the degree of commitment of the center is high, assignment of redistributive competencies to both levels of power is a proxy for centralization. Additionally, the poorer region may find its best interest in an institutional design where the regions decide first.
AB - In the European Union, a series of competencies are shared between a central agency called the European Commission, and the governments of the Member States. This paper focuses on two of those policies: research and regional development. Here, we model and discuss how the level of commitment of a central authority toward poor regions affects the design of the best decision-making process. We explore cases of full centralization and full decentralization, and situations where the two levels of government are allowed to take decisions, either simultaneously or sequentially. In the latter case, we make a distinction between a situation where the central agency decides first as in most federations, and one in which it decides second, then being an agent of national governments. This setting is especially relevant for the European Union. We show, in particular, that when the degree of commitment of the center is high, assignment of redistributive competencies to both levels of power is a proxy for centralization. Additionally, the poorer region may find its best interest in an institutional design where the regions decide first.
KW - European Union
KW - Fiscal federalism
KW - Higher education
KW - Interjurisdictional competition
KW - Regional development
KW - Research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861780529&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10797-011-9190-z
DO - 10.1007/s10797-011-9190-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84861780529
SN - 0927-5940
VL - 19
SP - 338
EP - 367
JO - International Tax and Public Finance
JF - International Tax and Public Finance
IS - 3
ER -