Doorgaan naar hoofdnavigatie Doorgaan naar zoeken Ga verder naar hoofdinhoud

Analysis of ELM stability with extended MHD models in JET, JT-60U and future JT-60SA tokamak plasmas

  • the JET contributors
  • , JT-60SA Research Unit
  • National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology
  • Culham Centre for Fusion Energy
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives
  • Eindhoven University of Technology
  • ITER
  • FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JULICH GMBH
  • Institute for Plasma Research
  • Instituto Superior Técnico
  • Queens University
  • University of Helsinki
  • VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
  • University of Napoli 'Federico II'
  • Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
  • Istituto di Fisica del Plasma Piero Caldirola
  • Consorzio Rfx
  • Kurchatov Institute
  • University of Napoli Parthenope
  • ENEA Centro Ricerche Frascati
  • Troitsk Insitute of Innovating and Thermonuclear Research (TRINITI)
  • University of Ghent
  • Fluid and Plasma Dynamics
  • Uppsala Universitet
  • The National Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technology
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
  • Università degli Studi di Catania
  • Fusion for Energy
  • National Institute for Fusion Science
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Aalto University
  • University of Latvia
  • Imperial College London
  • Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión
  • University of Oxford
  • EUROfusion
  • Karlsruher Institut für Technologie
  • University of York
  • Maritime University of Szczecin
  • Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN
  • Institute of Plasma Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
  • University of Trento
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Wigner Research Centre for Physics
  • University Mlynska
  • Lviv Polytechnic National University
  • University of Milano-Bicocca
  • The National Institute for Optoelectronics
  • Fourth State Research
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • STUDIECENTRUM VOOR KERNENERGIE / CENTRE D'ETUDE DE L'ENERGIE NUCLEAIRE
  • Narodowe Centrum Badań Jadrowych
  • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • Université Aix Marseille
  • University of Cagliari
  • University of Warwick
  • Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion
  • FOM Institute DIFFER
  • National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics
  • Jozef Stefan Institute
  • Université de Lorraine
  • Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Center for Energy Research
  • The 'Horia Hulubei' National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering
  • Chalmers University of Technology
  • European Commission
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  • Second University of Napoli
  • Warsaw University of Technology
  • University of Basilicata
  • Barcelona Supercomputing Center
  • University of Seville
  • Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata
  • Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
  • General Atomics
  • Universitat Innsbruck
  • University of Toyama
  • University of Strathclyde
  • National Technical University of Athens
  • University of Tuscia
  • Technical University of Denmark
  • KAIST
  • Seoul National University
  • UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK, NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND, CORK
  • Vienna University of Technology
  • University of Opole
  • Daegu University
  • National Fusion Research Institute (NFRI)
  • Dublin City University
  • Pelin Llc
  • Arizona State University
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  • University of Basel
  • Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
  • Consorzio CREATE
  • NCSR 'Demokritos'
  • Purdue University
  • University of California
  • Universidade de São Paulo
  • Lithuanian Energy Institute
  • HRS Fusion
  • Politecnico di Torino
  • University of Cassino
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
  • Fukui University of Technology
  • Hokkaido University
  • Japan Atomic Energy Agency
  • Keio University
  • Kyoto Institute of Technology
  • Kyoto University
  • Kyushu University
  • Nagoya University
  • National Institute of Technology, Gifu College
  • Osaka University
  • Shizuoka University
  • University of Tokyo
  • Tohoku University
  • Tokyo Institute of Technology
  • Tottori University
  • University of Tsukuba
  • Fusion for Energy

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan een tijdschriftArtikelpeer review

18 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

The stability with respect to a peelingballooning mode (PBM) was investigated numerically with extended MHD simulation codes in JET, JT-60U and future JT-60SA plasmas. The MINERVA-DI code was used to analyze the linear stability, including the effects of rotation and ion diamagnetic drift (w∗i), in JET-ILW and JT-60SA plasmas, and the JOREK code was used to simulate nonlinear dynamics with rotation, viscosity and resistivity in JT-60U plasmas. It was validated quantitatively that the ELM trigger condition in JET-ILW plasmas can be reasonably explained by taking into account both the rotation and w∗i effects in the numerical analysis. When deuterium poloidal rotation is evaluated based on neoclassical theory, an increase in the effective charge of plasma destabilizes the PBM because of an acceleration of rotation and a decrease in w∗i. The difference in the amount of ELM energy loss in JT-60U plasmas rotating in opposite directions was reproduced qualitatively with JOREK. By comparing the ELM affected areas with linear eigenfunctions, it was confirmed that the difference in the linear stability property, due not to the rotation direction but to the plasma density profile, is thought to be responsible for changing the ELM energy loss just after the ELM crash. A predictive study to determine the pedestal profiles in JT-60SA was performed by updating the EPED1 model to include the rotation and w∗i effects in the PBM stability analysis. It was shown that the plasma rotation predicted with the neoclassical toroidal viscosity degrades the pedestal performance by about 10% by destabilizing the PBM, but the pressure pedestal height will be high enough to achieve the target parameters required for the ITER-like shape inductive scenario in JT-60SA.

Originele taal-2Engels
Artikelnummer014032
TijdschriftPlasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
Volume60
Nummer van het tijdschrift1
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 1 jan. 2018

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Analysis of ELM stability with extended MHD models in JET, JT-60U and future JT-60SA tokamak plasmas'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit