TY - JOUR
T1 - Smart Is the New Strong
T2 - An Investigation of the Contribution of Physical, Cognitive, Anthropometric, and Personality Variables to Success in a Tier 1 Special Forces Qualification Course
AU - Pattyn, Nathalie
AU - Van Cutsem, Jeroen
AU - Van Puyvelde, Martine
AU - Vandenberg, Nicholas
AU - Lacroix, Emilie
AU - Dessy, Emilie
AU - Verheyden, Camille
AU - Huybens, Wouter
AU - Lo Bue, Salvatore
AU - Tibax, Veerle
AU - Vliegen, Robert
AU - Ceccaldi, Jean
AU - Savieri, Perseverence
AU - Stas, Lara
AU - Mairesse, Olivier
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Psychological Association
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Selection and training of special operations forces operators is long-lasting process that involves significant manpower to select the best candidates for one of the most demanding and dangerous jobs in the world. The Tier 1 qualification course, which represents the initial months of training for an operator, is so labor-intensive that even after completing a specific selection course to reduce the number of failures, attrition remains the highest among all military trainings. This study presents data of 77 successfully selected candidates to the special forces qualification course in Belgium and investigates the differences between succeeders (n = 16) and dropouts (n = 61). Unlike previous investigations, these results do not describe successfully selected candidates for the training, rather successful operators. Additionally, previous studies have primarily focused on physical fitness as the performance outcome to identify relevant subcomponents such as aerobic capacity, muscular strength, or power. By contrast, the present article provides a detailed investigation of the performance profile at not only the physical level, but also cognitive and personality levels for among succeeders and dropouts in the qualification course. Unsurprisingly, physical fitness was a significant difference between groups, and a major predictor of success. However, for the first time, we demonstrate the major influence of intelligence (measured as intelligence quotient), as the most important determinant of success for the qualification course, according to a relative weight analysis. In addition, the detailed intellectual assessment shows that some visuospatial measures are less relevant for success, whereas verbal measures are highly relevant, and may have been overlooked in previous literature.
AB - Selection and training of special operations forces operators is long-lasting process that involves significant manpower to select the best candidates for one of the most demanding and dangerous jobs in the world. The Tier 1 qualification course, which represents the initial months of training for an operator, is so labor-intensive that even after completing a specific selection course to reduce the number of failures, attrition remains the highest among all military trainings. This study presents data of 77 successfully selected candidates to the special forces qualification course in Belgium and investigates the differences between succeeders (n = 16) and dropouts (n = 61). Unlike previous investigations, these results do not describe successfully selected candidates for the training, rather successful operators. Additionally, previous studies have primarily focused on physical fitness as the performance outcome to identify relevant subcomponents such as aerobic capacity, muscular strength, or power. By contrast, the present article provides a detailed investigation of the performance profile at not only the physical level, but also cognitive and personality levels for among succeeders and dropouts in the qualification course. Unsurprisingly, physical fitness was a significant difference between groups, and a major predictor of success. However, for the first time, we demonstrate the major influence of intelligence (measured as intelligence quotient), as the most important determinant of success for the qualification course, according to a relative weight analysis. In addition, the detailed intellectual assessment shows that some visuospatial measures are less relevant for success, whereas verbal measures are highly relevant, and may have been overlooked in previous literature.
KW - intelligence
KW - intelligence quotient
KW - multidisciplinary assessment
KW - selection
KW - special forces
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183684608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/spy0000336
DO - 10.1037/spy0000336
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85183684608
SN - 2157-3905
VL - 13
SP - 183
EP - 204
JO - Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology
JF - Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology
IS - 2
ER -