TY - GEN
T1 - Surrogate-Based Optimization of a High-Altitude Propeller
AU - Mourousias, Nikolaos
AU - Malim, Ahmed
AU - Marinus, Benoît G.
AU - Runacres, Mark
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - A surrogate-based, multipoint and multiobjective optimization was performed in this work for a High-Altitude Propeller. For each blade design, the performance was evaluated with 3D RANS at three advance ratios for cruise and one advance ratio for climb, while the ability to take off, was assessed with Vortex Theory. Moreover, a different sampling strategy for the DoE phase was tested as an alternative to the Latin Hypercube Sampling of the whole design space. In this optimization problem, two objective functions were defined, one for the aerodynamic performance and one for the propeller weight, while Kriging was used to find the response surface of each objective. The Expected Improvement Matrix with the Euclidean distance was used as an infill criterion and the Kriging Believer algorithm was adopted in order to parallelize the procedure. The Pareto front formation is discussed as, well as the characteristics of some specific designs. In the end, a variance based sensitivity analysis is performed on the evaluated designs to give insight into the importance of the different design variables.
AB - A surrogate-based, multipoint and multiobjective optimization was performed in this work for a High-Altitude Propeller. For each blade design, the performance was evaluated with 3D RANS at three advance ratios for cruise and one advance ratio for climb, while the ability to take off, was assessed with Vortex Theory. Moreover, a different sampling strategy for the DoE phase was tested as an alternative to the Latin Hypercube Sampling of the whole design space. In this optimization problem, two objective functions were defined, one for the aerodynamic performance and one for the propeller weight, while Kriging was used to find the response surface of each objective. The Expected Improvement Matrix with the Euclidean distance was used as an infill criterion and the Kriging Believer algorithm was adopted in order to parallelize the procedure. The Pareto front formation is discussed as, well as the characteristics of some specific designs. In the end, a variance based sensitivity analysis is performed on the evaluated designs to give insight into the importance of the different design variables.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126780203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2021-2597
DO - 10.2514/6.2021-2597
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85126780203
SN - 9781624106101
T3 - AIAA Aviation and Aeronautics Forum and Exposition, AIAA AVIATION Forum 2021
BT - AIAA Aviation and Aeronautics Forum and Exposition, AIAA AVIATION Forum 2021
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
T2 - AIAA Aviation and Aeronautics Forum and Exposition, AIAA AVIATION Forum 2021
Y2 - 2 August 2021 through 6 August 2021
ER -