TY - GEN
T1 - Identification of the stress-strain behaviour of a tensile specimen after necking
AU - Debruyne, Dimitri
AU - Cooreman, Steven
AU - Lecompte, David
AU - Sol, Hugo
AU - Van Hemelrijck, Danny
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - When performing a basic tensile test on a plate specimen, one can obtain the true plastic stress-strain relation of the material prior to necking. With the aid of finite element analysis (FEA) it should also be possible to learn more about the post-necking behaviour of the material. Basically, one starts from an initial material model obtained from the basic tensile test (up to the ultimate tensile strength); the plastic stress-strain curve is then extrapolated beyond the ultimate tensile strength. Next, the tensile test is simulated with this theoretical material input and from the results a conventional stress-strain diagram is constructed. This theoretical stress-strain diagram is then compared to the experimental diagram. Based on the differences between the theoretical and the experimental stress-strain behaviour, the material model is adjusted and the above steps are repeated until a satisfactory convergence is reached. The main difficulty of this procedure lies in the correction of the initially proposed material model. We will present a number of options to achieve this. However, although the initial results from such an approach might look reasonably well, it will also be shown that this commonly adopted procedure has it flaws which are not easily overcome.
AB - When performing a basic tensile test on a plate specimen, one can obtain the true plastic stress-strain relation of the material prior to necking. With the aid of finite element analysis (FEA) it should also be possible to learn more about the post-necking behaviour of the material. Basically, one starts from an initial material model obtained from the basic tensile test (up to the ultimate tensile strength); the plastic stress-strain curve is then extrapolated beyond the ultimate tensile strength. Next, the tensile test is simulated with this theoretical material input and from the results a conventional stress-strain diagram is constructed. This theoretical stress-strain diagram is then compared to the experimental diagram. Based on the differences between the theoretical and the experimental stress-strain behaviour, the material model is adjusted and the above steps are repeated until a satisfactory convergence is reached. The main difficulty of this procedure lies in the correction of the initially proposed material model. We will present a number of options to achieve this. However, although the initial results from such an approach might look reasonably well, it will also be shown that this commonly adopted procedure has it flaws which are not easily overcome.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750369283&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:33750369283
SN - 091205395X
SN - 9780912053950
T3 - Proceedings of the 2006 SEM Annual Conference and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics 2006
SP - 276
EP - 282
BT - Proceedings of the 2006 SEM Annual Conference and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics 2006
T2 - SEM Annual Conference and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics 2006
Y2 - 4 June 2006 through 7 June 2006
ER -