Ethical Caveats Surrounding Mental Performance Enhancement

Marion Trousselard, Nicholas H. van den Berg, Koen Hogenelst

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this chapter, we apply ethical frameworks that help guide moral decisions on the use of scientific and technological advances for performance enhancement. We do not attempt to provide a clear answer to ethical dilemmas, rather we raise several considerations regarding the use of mental performance enhancement in humans. We describe several ethical frameworks which are woven throughout the present chapter, particularly when reviewing examples of the various tools used to enhance mental performance. Indeed, several of these tools rely on identifying norms and convictions of society or the individual (i.e., deontology), weighing cost–benefit analysis of applied methods (i.e., consequentialism), and through emphasis on the individual as an autonomous moral agent capable of making decisions (i.e., virtue ethics).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Mental Performance
EditorsNathalie Pattyn, Robin Hauffa
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutlege Taylor & Francis Group
Chapter18
Pages363
Number of pages374
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781003378969
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical Caveats Surrounding Mental Performance Enhancement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this