TY - JOUR
T1 - Decontamination of heart valve and arterial allografts in the European Homograft Bank (EHB)
T2 - Comparison of two different antibiotic cocktails in low temperature conditions
AU - Jashari, R.
AU - Tabaku, M.
AU - Van Hoeck, B.
AU - Cochéz, C.
AU - Callant, M.
AU - Vanderkelen, A.
PY - 2007/12
Y1 - 2007/12
N2 - The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of two different antibiotic cocktails in the cardiovascular allograft decontamination. Low temperature, low-concentration antibiotic cocktail with Cefoxitin, Lincomycin, Polymixin B and Vancomycin was decontamination protocol in EHB for many years. The modified cocktail doesn't contain Cefoxitin. The study had two steps. First step: cardiovascular allografts from 80 donors are incubated in classical (group 1) or modified cocktail (group 2). Second step: 184 and 182 allografts of group 1 and group 2 are incubated in the modified and classical antibiotic cocktail, respectively. The bacteriological examination is performed in three steps: A-transport solution, B-decontamination solution and C-cryopreservation solution. During the first step 23.75% of the tissues were initially contaminated mainly with Staphylococcus (78.95%). 93.75% of the allografts of group 1 and 100% of group 2 were sterile after incubation (p = 0.058). 25.54% and 30.77% of group 1 and 2, respectively were contaminated in A-examination during the second step. Staphylococci were isolated in 82.98% and 69.64% in group 1 and 2, respectively. About 4.35% of group 1 and 5.5% of group 2 were contaminated in A, B, and C whereas 5.4% of group 1 and 4.4% of group 2 were contaminated in B or C after being sterile in A. Finally 9.78% of the tissues were rejected and 90.22% cryopreserved in the modified, whereas 9.89% rejected and 90.11% accepted in the classical group (p = 0.1). The difference was non-significant in the level of decontamination between the two cocktails. Contamination of some tissues with low growing, low-pathogen germs that appeared in B or C examination, couldn't be explained. This issue needs complementary investigation.
AB - The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of two different antibiotic cocktails in the cardiovascular allograft decontamination. Low temperature, low-concentration antibiotic cocktail with Cefoxitin, Lincomycin, Polymixin B and Vancomycin was decontamination protocol in EHB for many years. The modified cocktail doesn't contain Cefoxitin. The study had two steps. First step: cardiovascular allografts from 80 donors are incubated in classical (group 1) or modified cocktail (group 2). Second step: 184 and 182 allografts of group 1 and group 2 are incubated in the modified and classical antibiotic cocktail, respectively. The bacteriological examination is performed in three steps: A-transport solution, B-decontamination solution and C-cryopreservation solution. During the first step 23.75% of the tissues were initially contaminated mainly with Staphylococcus (78.95%). 93.75% of the allografts of group 1 and 100% of group 2 were sterile after incubation (p = 0.058). 25.54% and 30.77% of group 1 and 2, respectively were contaminated in A-examination during the second step. Staphylococci were isolated in 82.98% and 69.64% in group 1 and 2, respectively. About 4.35% of group 1 and 5.5% of group 2 were contaminated in A, B, and C whereas 5.4% of group 1 and 4.4% of group 2 were contaminated in B or C after being sterile in A. Finally 9.78% of the tissues were rejected and 90.22% cryopreserved in the modified, whereas 9.89% rejected and 90.11% accepted in the classical group (p = 0.1). The difference was non-significant in the level of decontamination between the two cocktails. Contamination of some tissues with low growing, low-pathogen germs that appeared in B or C examination, couldn't be explained. This issue needs complementary investigation.
KW - Allograft
KW - Antibiotic cocktail
KW - Arterial allograft
KW - Bacterial contamination
KW - Cryopreservation
KW - Donor tissue
KW - Heart valve allograft
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35748946357&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10561-007-9040-5
DO - 10.1007/s10561-007-9040-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 17440832
AN - SCOPUS:35748946357
SN - 1389-9333
VL - 8
SP - 247
EP - 255
JO - Cell and Tissue Banking
JF - Cell and Tissue Banking
IS - 4
ER -