TY - JOUR
T1 - Current Practices for Mental Fatigue Quantification and Induction in Movement Science
T2 - Introducing the SPeCIFY Guidelines
AU - Schampheleer, Emilie
AU - Habay, Jelle
AU - Proost, Matthias
AU - Arauz, Y. Laurisa Arenales
AU - Russell, Suzanna
AU - Roose, Manon
AU - Bian, Chao
AU - Meeusen, Romain
AU - De Pauw, Kevin
AU - Roelands, Bart
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Mental fatigue (MF) is a complex phenomenon with significant implications for human performance, for which there are numerous studies investigating the effects of MF. Nevertheless, there is considerable variability in the approaches used to induce and quantify MF, making it hard to compare findings across studies and draw well-supported conclusions. This review addresses the methodological variability in the induction and quantification methods of MF in movement science in the following ways: on the one hand, by providing an overview of task design strategies to induce MF, emphasizing the importance of tailoring task duration, difficulty, and nature to individual participants and specific research contexts; on the other hand, by providing an overview of current methods used to quantify MF, including behavioural, subjective, and physiological measures, and highlighting the strengths and limitations of each. Finally, this review proposes a best-practice framework for MF research, incorporating multi-method approaches for the induction and quantification of MF and introducing the Settings, Protocol establishments, Confounders, Individuals, Framework, and Yield (SPeCIFY) reporting guidelines that aim at improving consistency and transparency in future MF studies.
AB - Mental fatigue (MF) is a complex phenomenon with significant implications for human performance, for which there are numerous studies investigating the effects of MF. Nevertheless, there is considerable variability in the approaches used to induce and quantify MF, making it hard to compare findings across studies and draw well-supported conclusions. This review addresses the methodological variability in the induction and quantification methods of MF in movement science in the following ways: on the one hand, by providing an overview of task design strategies to induce MF, emphasizing the importance of tailoring task duration, difficulty, and nature to individual participants and specific research contexts; on the other hand, by providing an overview of current methods used to quantify MF, including behavioural, subjective, and physiological measures, and highlighting the strengths and limitations of each. Finally, this review proposes a best-practice framework for MF research, incorporating multi-method approaches for the induction and quantification of MF and introducing the Settings, Protocol establishments, Confounders, Individuals, Framework, and Yield (SPeCIFY) reporting guidelines that aim at improving consistency and transparency in future MF studies.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015466788
U2 - 10.1007/s40279-025-02286-3
DO - 10.1007/s40279-025-02286-3
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105015466788
SN - 0112-1642
VL - 55
SP - 2387
EP - 2413
JO - Sports Medicine
JF - Sports Medicine
IS - 10
ER -