Comparison of three methods for shape recognition in the case of mine detection

Nada Milisavljević

doi:10.1016/S0167-8655(99)00074-4

Comparison of three methods for shape recognition in the case of mine detection

Nada Milisavljević

Communication, Information, Systems and Sensors

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three methods for shape recognition and their usefulness are analyzed and compared based on the antipersonnel mine detection problem. It is shown that, because of the variety and complexity of the problem, neither of the methods can be completely discarded.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1079-1083
Number of pages	5
Journal	Pattern Recognition Letters
Volume	20
Issue number	11-13
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8655(99)00074-4
Publication status	Published - Nov 1999
Event	Proceedings of the 1999 Pattern Recognition in Practice (PRP VI) - Vlieland, Neth Duration: 2 Jun 1999 → 4 Jun 1999

Access to Document

10.1016/S0167-8655(99)00074-4

Cite this

@article{87099478b51d44f8bf4dff6dd6e7a1c3,

title = "Comparison of three methods for shape recognition in the case of mine detection",

abstract = "Three methods for shape recognition and their usefulness are analyzed and compared based on the antipersonnel mine detection problem. It is shown that, because of the variety and complexity of the problem, neither of the methods can be completely discarded.",

author = "Nada Milisavljevi{\'c}",

year = "1999",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/S0167-8655(99)00074-4",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

pages = "1079--1083",

journal = "Pattern Recognition Letters",

issn = "0167-8655",

number = "11-13",

note = "Proceedings of the 1999 Pattern Recognition in Practice (PRP VI) ; Conference date: 02-06-1999 Through 04-06-1999",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of three methods for shape recognition in the case of mine detection

AU - Milisavljević, Nada

PY - 1999/11

Y1 - 1999/11

N2 - Three methods for shape recognition and their usefulness are analyzed and compared based on the antipersonnel mine detection problem. It is shown that, because of the variety and complexity of the problem, neither of the methods can be completely discarded.

AB - Three methods for shape recognition and their usefulness are analyzed and compared based on the antipersonnel mine detection problem. It is shown that, because of the variety and complexity of the problem, neither of the methods can be completely discarded.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0033220795

U2 - 10.1016/S0167-8655(99)00074-4

DO - 10.1016/S0167-8655(99)00074-4

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:0033220795

SN - 0167-8655

VL - 20

SP - 1079

EP - 1083

JO - Pattern Recognition Letters

JF - Pattern Recognition Letters

IS - 11-13

T2 - Proceedings of the 1999 Pattern Recognition in Practice (PRP VI)

Y2 - 2 June 1999 through 4 June 1999

ER -

Comparison of three methods for shape recognition in the case of mine detection

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this