Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Active control of type-I edge-localized modes with n=1 perturbation fields in the JET tokamak

  • Y. Liang
  • , H. R. Koslowski
  • , P. R. Thomas
  • , E. Nardon
  • , B. Alper
  • , P. Andrew
  • , Y. Andrew
  • , G. Arnoux
  • , Y. Baranov
  • , M. Bécoulet
  • , M. Beurskens
  • , T. Biewer
  • , M. Bigi
  • , K. Crombe
  • , E. De La Luna
  • , P. De Vries
  • , W. Fundamenski
  • , S. Gerasimov
  • , C. Giroud
  • , M. P. Gryaznevich
  • N. Hawkes, S. Hotchin, D. Howell, S. Jachmich, V. Kiptily, L. Moreira, V. Parail, S. D. Pinches, E. Rachlew, O. Zimmermann
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique (CEA)
  • Culham Centre for Fusion Energy
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  • Consorzio Rfx
  • University of Ghent
  • CIEMAT
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

601 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Type-I edge-localized modes (ELMs) have been mitigated at the JET tokamak using a static external n=1 perturbation field generated by four error field correction coils located far from the plasma. During the application of the n=1 field the ELM frequency increased by a factor of 4 and the amplitude of the Dα signal decreased. The energy loss per ELM normalized to the total stored energy, ΔW/W, dropped to values below 2%. Transport analyses shows no or only a moderate (up to 20%) degradation of energy confinement time during the ELM mitigation phase.

Original languageEnglish
Article number265004
JournalPhysical Review Letters
Volume98
Issue number26
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Active control of type-I edge-localized modes with n=1 perturbation fields in the JET tokamak'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this