TY - JOUR
T1 - Virtual reality rehabilitation for unilateral spatial neglect: A systematic review of immersive, semi-immersive and non-immersive techniques
AU - Salatino, Adriana
AU - Zavattaro, Claudio
AU - Gammeri, Roberto
AU - Cirillo, Emanuele
AU - Piatti, Maria Luisa
AU - Pyasik, Maria
AU - Serra, Hilary
AU - Pia, Lorenzo
AU - Geminiani, Giuliano
AU - Ricci, Raffaella
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/9/1
Y1 - 2023/9/1
N2 - Introduction: In recent decades, new virtual reality (VR)-based protocols have been proposed for the rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN), a debilitating disorder of spatial awareness. However, it remains unclear which type of VR protocol and level of VR immersion can maximize the clinical benefits. To answer these questions, we conducted a systematic review of the use of VR for the rehabilitation of USN. Method: Studies between 2000 and 2022 that met the inclusion criteria were classified according to their research design and degree of immersion (non-immersive, NIVR; semi-immersive, SIVR; immersive, IVR). Results: A total of 375 studies were identified, of which 26 met the inclusion criteria. Improvements were found in 84.6% of the reviewed studies: 85.7% used NIVR, 100% used SIVR and 55.6% used IVR. However, only 42.3% of them included a control group and only 19.2% were randomized control trials (RCT). Conclusion: VR protocols may offer new opportunities for USN rehabilitation, although further RCTs are needed to validate their clinical efficacy
AB - Introduction: In recent decades, new virtual reality (VR)-based protocols have been proposed for the rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN), a debilitating disorder of spatial awareness. However, it remains unclear which type of VR protocol and level of VR immersion can maximize the clinical benefits. To answer these questions, we conducted a systematic review of the use of VR for the rehabilitation of USN. Method: Studies between 2000 and 2022 that met the inclusion criteria were classified according to their research design and degree of immersion (non-immersive, NIVR; semi-immersive, SIVR; immersive, IVR). Results: A total of 375 studies were identified, of which 26 met the inclusion criteria. Improvements were found in 84.6% of the reviewed studies: 85.7% used NIVR, 100% used SIVR and 55.6% used IVR. However, only 42.3% of them included a control group and only 19.2% were randomized control trials (RCT). Conclusion: VR protocols may offer new opportunities for USN rehabilitation, although further RCTs are needed to validate their clinical efficacy
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Stroke
KW - Unilateral spatial neglect
KW - Video games
KW - Virtual reality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165666014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105248
DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105248
M3 - Review article
SN - 0149-7634
VL - 152
JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
M1 - 105248
ER -