Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Taking bacteriophage therapy seriously: A moral argument

  • Military Hospital Queen Astrid
  • KU Leuven
  • George Eliava Institute of Bacteriophage, Microbiology and Virology
  • University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre
  • National Institute of Public Health NIZP
  • University Medical Centre Groningen
  • Polish Academy of Sciences
  • Medical University of Warsaw

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

48 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

The excessive and improper use of antibiotics has led to an increasing incidence of bacterial resistance. In Europe the yearly number of infections caused by multidrug resistant bacteria is more than 400.000, each year resulting in 25.000 attributable deaths. Few new antibiotics are in the pipeline of the pharmaceutical industry. Early in the 20th century, bacteriophages were described as entities that can control bacterial populations. Although bacteriophage therapy was developed and practiced in Europe and the former Soviet republics, the use of bacteriophages in clinical setting was neglected in Western Europe since the introduction of traditional antibiotics. Given the worldwide antibiotic crisis there is now a growing interest in making bacteriophage therapy available for use in modern western medicine. Despite the growing interest, access to bacteriophage therapy remains highly problematic. In this paper, we argue that the current state of affairs is morally unacceptable and that all stakeholders (pharmaceutical industry, competent authorities, lawmakers, regulators, and politicians) have the moral duty and the shared responsibility towards making bacteriophage therapy urgently available for all patients in need.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer621316
FachzeitschriftBioMed Research International
Jahrgang2014
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2014

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Taking bacteriophage therapy seriously: A moral argument“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren