Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Hyperspectral anomaly detection: A comparative evaluation of methods

  • D. Borghys
  • , V. Achard
  • , S. R. Rotman
  • , N. Gorelik
  • , C. Perneel
  • , Emile Schweicher
  • Office National d'Etudes et de Recherches Aerospatiales
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/KonferenzbandKonferenzbeitragBegutachtung

15 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Anomaly detection in hyperspectral data has received a lot of attention for various applications. The aim of anomaly detection is to detect pixels in the hyperspectral datacube whose spectra differ significantly from the background spectra. In anomaly detection no prior knowledge about the target is assumed. Anomaly detection methods in general estimate the spectra of the background (locally or globally) and then detect anomalies as pixels with a large spectral distance w.r.t. the determined background spectra. Many types of anomaly detectors have been proposed in literature, each depending on several parameters. The aim of this paper is to compare the results of different types of anomaly detection when they are applied to scenes with different complexity: urban scenes with different complexity and rural scenes with sub-pixel anomalies. This paper only considers hyperspectral data in the VNIR and SWIR part of the EM spectrum (λ = 0.4-2.5μm).

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel2011 30th URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, URSIGASS 2011
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2011
Veranstaltung2011 30th URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, URSIGASS 2011 - Istanbul, Türkei
Dauer: 13 Aug. 201120 Aug. 2011

Publikationsreihe

Name2011 30th URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, URSIGASS 2011

Konferenz

Konferenz2011 30th URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, URSIGASS 2011
Land/GebietTürkei
OrtIstanbul
Zeitraum13/08/1120/08/11

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Hyperspectral anomaly detection: A comparative evaluation of methods“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren