TY - GEN
T1 - Compliance You Said? Why May Safety Critical Operators Deviate from Procedures? A Military Aviation Perspective Comparing Operators from Different Operational Fields
AU - Detaille, Frédéric
AU - Grant, Rebecca
AU - Dessy, Emilie
AU - Puyvelde, Martine Van
AU - Pattyn, Nathalie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - From aviation accident and incident investigation reports, procedural deviations can be considered as recurring causes related to Human Factors. This research aimed at identifying perceptions of military aviation safety critical personnel regarding deviations; and their motivations to deviate. Deviations were suspected to be frequent but rarely reported or discovered. The choice was thus made to call upon sharp-end operators’ experience using a self-completion questionnaire to gather quantitative and qualitative data from Aircrew, Air Traffic Management, and Maintainers. The results suggested that the procedures themselves, resources, mission, organizational culture, and organizational environment can be considered as motivations to deviate. The organizational culture was potentially found as predominating over the considered group’s professional culture, and deployed operations as catalyzing deviations. A negative label was generally attributed to deviations by respondents. However, they reported that creative problem-solving in acute situations may require to adapt the existing decisional algorithms to reality of complex systems.
AB - From aviation accident and incident investigation reports, procedural deviations can be considered as recurring causes related to Human Factors. This research aimed at identifying perceptions of military aviation safety critical personnel regarding deviations; and their motivations to deviate. Deviations were suspected to be frequent but rarely reported or discovered. The choice was thus made to call upon sharp-end operators’ experience using a self-completion questionnaire to gather quantitative and qualitative data from Aircrew, Air Traffic Management, and Maintainers. The results suggested that the procedures themselves, resources, mission, organizational culture, and organizational environment can be considered as motivations to deviate. The organizational culture was potentially found as predominating over the considered group’s professional culture, and deployed operations as catalyzing deviations. A negative label was generally attributed to deviations by respondents. However, they reported that creative problem-solving in acute situations may require to adapt the existing decisional algorithms to reality of complex systems.
KW - Human factors
KW - Military aviation
KW - Organizational Culture
KW - Procedural deviations
KW - Safety management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123844625&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-80288-2_31
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-80288-2_31
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85123844625
SN - 9783030802875
T3 - Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
SP - 256
EP - 263
BT - Advances in Safety Management and Human Performance - Proceedings of the AHFE 2021 Virtual Conferences on Safety Management and Human Factors, and Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance, 2021
A2 - Arezes, Pedro M.
A2 - Boring, Ronald L.
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
T2 - AHFE International Conferences on Safety Management and Human Factors, and Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance, 2021
Y2 - 25 July 2021 through 29 July 2021
ER -