TY - JOUR
T1 - Cognitive Performance Enhancement
T2 - Do Biofeedback and Neurofeedback Work?
AU - Dessy, Emilie
AU - Van Puyvelde, Martine
AU - Mairesse, Olivier
AU - Neyt, Xavier
AU - Pattyn, Nathalie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer International Publishing AG.
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Biofeedback (BFB) and neurofeedback (NFB) training are two promising approaches for the non-invasive modulation of human physiological activity paired with cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functioning. In this article, we summarize the state of the art with regard to the efficiency of BFB and NFB studies for the optimization of cognitive performance within a non-clinical context. We review the different training protocols with their underlying theoretical perspectives and the different outcomes regarding cognitive performance. This review showed that BFB and NFB are promising training techniques. However, the use of varying terminology to refer to similar concepts, diverse methodological designs, and cognitive assessments along with apparent differences in NFB frequency ranges makes it difficult to compare the outcomes over different studies and to draw general conclusions. Furthermore, a question largely ignored until now remains about the long-term effects of both training and thus the sustainability of the achieved cognitive enhancement.
AB - Biofeedback (BFB) and neurofeedback (NFB) training are two promising approaches for the non-invasive modulation of human physiological activity paired with cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functioning. In this article, we summarize the state of the art with regard to the efficiency of BFB and NFB studies for the optimization of cognitive performance within a non-clinical context. We review the different training protocols with their underlying theoretical perspectives and the different outcomes regarding cognitive performance. This review showed that BFB and NFB are promising training techniques. However, the use of varying terminology to refer to similar concepts, diverse methodological designs, and cognitive assessments along with apparent differences in NFB frequency ranges makes it difficult to compare the outcomes over different studies and to draw general conclusions. Furthermore, a question largely ignored until now remains about the long-term effects of both training and thus the sustainability of the achieved cognitive enhancement.
KW - Biofeedback
KW - Cognitive performance
KW - Heart rate variability
KW - Neurofeedback
KW - Nootropic
KW - Respiratory sinus arrhythmia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169139021&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s41465-017-0039-y
DO - 10.1007/s41465-017-0039-y
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85169139021
SN - 2509-3290
VL - 2
SP - 12
EP - 42
JO - Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
JF - Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
IS - 1
ER -